Home > Access Violation > Access Violation At Address Msado15.dll

Access Violation At Address Msado15.dll

Please advise. Re: Access violation at address ... Everyting is OK with my other computer. The offending line is the dmSQL.adoGenericQuery.ExecSQL; just before the end: procedure TAuthorization.SynchAuthToSQL(sStationIFN:string='';bForceUpdate:boolean=false); const CountQuery = 'select count(*) from DSS_Authorizations'+ ' where AuthIEN = :authIEN '+ ' and authstationifn = :stationIFN' + Check This Out

Make a suggestion Dev centers Windows Office Visual Studio Microsoft Azure More... Read of address 03217000. Create an account to join the discussion. Our users have been hitting it pretty hard though. https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/0f94bc7f-cb69-4361-8fd0-ea613050ba0b/access-violation-at-address-4de16231-in-module-msado15dll-read-of-address-00000000?forum=sqldataaccess

All the data passed to the parameters of the TADOStoredProc look fine going in. I have a problem with 'ExecSQL' when I try to update any field with Update SQL command in C++ Builder 6.0. Follow admin / 22 Nov 2011 at 5:23pm Hi Peter,See your email for more information.The problem is that there is one key with different name in the two models. Browse other questions tagged delphi ado delphi-xe2 or ask your own question.

Probably 80% of our customers are still on XP. –Jerry Dodge Jul 10 '12 at 17:53 Agree with @Lieven. Access violation because of module 'msado15.dll' Hi everybody, I am workin on WIN XP and MySQL server 4.0. About Toad World Quest Communities Privacy Policy Terms of Use Contact Us Send Feedback About Quest Toad World is sponsored by Copyright © 2016 Quest Software Inc. FedjaПросмотреть все ответы этого автора19-07-2007 04:11Попробуй сделать ADOQuery.ParamCheck := false, а после загрузки сложного запроса: ADOQuery1.Parameters.ParseSQL(ADOQuery1.SQL.Text, true); GreenПросмотреть все ответы этого автора16-07-2007 23:47|Комментарий к предыдущим ответамСтранный подход, насколько я помню LEFT

Read of address 0000000C by omar.flores_062 on 25 Feb 2014 Access violation at address ..... If the issue still appears, reverse-engineer your development db into a model and, please, pack both the models and send them to [email protected] Read of address 00000000. http://www.delphigroups.info/2/7/300114.html Why call it a "major" revision if the suggested changes are seemingly minor?

Best regards. drawing a regular hexagon How smart is the original Ridley Scott Xenomorph really? Access violation because of module 'msado15.dll' Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Search Thread Advanced Search Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded SQL.ru FAQ , Guest>> || || | / Delphi Access violation at address ...

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2640696Sam Zha TechNet Community Support

Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:41 AM Reply | Quote Moderator 0 Sign in to vote Hi Sam! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11418906/is-there-a-known-issue-using-delphi-xe2-ado-components-with-the-sqloledb-1-provi The version of MDAC on the x64 machine is laterthan the version of MDAC on the win32 machine. The error occurs when I attempt to violate a database constraint, close and reopen the connection and try to violate another constraint. We will check where inconsistency is, repair it and send it back to you.

Index Register Login You are not logged in. his comment is here The entire madExcept log would be a good start. I know about this problem, but think that this is not my case. in module msado15.dll [new] SAMANDCO Guest AdoQuery 9 09, 16:52[6797302] | / Delphi

Workaround is to name the two keys to have the same name in both models and then generate alter script. Create an account to join the discussion. Brad Wood writes: Quote Confirmed unrelated to Delphi 7 update (rollback produced same results). this contact form Solve equation in determinant more common way to say "act upon word or a promise" How do I dehumanize a humanoid alien?

in module msado15.dll read of address ... in module msado15.dll read of address ... ابزار های تاپیک نمایش نسخه مناسب برای چاپ تحت نظر گرفتن این تاپیک… نمایش نمایش خطی نمایش نوشته ها به شکل زیر مجموعه های You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.

Follow plynch_625 / 21 Nov 2011 at 3:17pm TDM EurekaLog 6.0.14.txt Lucus,I have been experiencing the same issue.

Green-у. Как посоветовал, проблема решилась. Только немного стало неудобно, теперь при каждом изменении SQL приходится это делать. Если после ParseSQL включить ADOQuery.ParamCheck := true то опять идут ошибки. Everything is allright now.. Why study finite-dimensional vector spaces in the abstract if they are all isomorphic to R^n? All information you will send us will be kept private and only for the reason of solvingyour issue and once resolved, it will be all safely discarded.Thank you very much.Regards,Lukas Create

Not the answer you're looking for? select N.IDNom, N.IDNomtype, N.Name, N.Obozn, N.Shifr, N.Weight, N.Note, N.IDEdIzm, N.IDStorType, N.IDSubType, N.EngName, N.TNVED, N.Kod1C, E.EdIzm, E.EngName as EngEdIzm, S.Name as StorName from Nomenclature N, EdIzmer E, StoragesTypes S See Resolving size mismatch exceptions with the Delphi 7.1 update for more information on this fix. http://homecomputermarket.com/access-violation/access-violation-at-address-in-module-read-of-address-delphi.html sx1040bii4.

GreenПросмотреть все ответы этого автора20-07-2007 00:00|Комментарий к предыдущим ответамТормозов при обработке запросов с JOIN и без них не наблюдалось, если запрос построен правильно и правильно определены индексы и связи. Видать база FedjaПросмотреть все ответы этого автора19-07-2007 18:36|Сообщение от автора вопросаПрограмма коммерческая. И делается для предприятий. А у некоторых предприятий уже есть купленные СУБД. А они стоят не дешево. И покупать еще одну, What is the specific error message you are getting now? –Lieven Keersmaekers Jul 10 '12 at 17:46 I don't know what to tell you, we've been using ADO/SQLOLEDB.1 extremely Access violation in address ...

All the values passed in seem correct and it hasn't been changedsince the last time it worked.